- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:49:39 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 17:50:19 UTC
Do you mean "abort the substeps" above? Losing events seems really bad. We should not let that happen. One way could be to only handle new external tasks once the existing tasks have finished or resulted in service worker termination. If someone creates a bunch of tasks in a running service worker that should not then lead to the next hundred network fetches getting lost if the UA decides upon termination. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/649#issuecomment-78545531
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 17:50:19 UTC