Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)

> Or just create a fixed sized splash screen in landscape and portrait?

Yes, snapshot of it.

> That would not work e.g. on desktop where the window can be resized while
the launch screen is being displayed. Also, you may have multiple monitors
of different resolutions or aspect ratios.

On desktop, it should be ok loading the cached splash-screen-html without
making a snapshot. But i see the problem...

> Should we check the splash.html for updates, if so, how often?

On installing the web-app and on changing the last-modified of the manifest
(or the version?)

> What is the use case, what extra flexibility do you need that is not
provided by the static 9-piece image?

HTML / CSS is well known by all webdevelopers, the 9-piece image is new
mechanism developers have to learn.






2015-03-09 16:31 GMT+01:00 Marcos Caceres <notifications@github.com>:

> There are some implementability concerns with using an HTML document. For
> example, what if some of the resources needed to render splash.html do not
> load or load too slowly, or you get 404? Should we check the splash.html
> for updates, if so, how often?
>
> @nuxodin <https://github.com/nuxodin> : Yes, this is basically the whole
> point: on some OSs, booting up the webview is just too slow. Otherwise, you
> would not need the splashscreen at all. The index.html would serve just
> fine (e.g., on FxOS, we don't need splash screens because we can get a
> webview up in 200ms). This is why we originally rejected adding splash
> screens to this spec. Maybe Moore's law will allows us to overcome this
> limitation in the future.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/9#issuecomment-77876134>.
>



-- 
Freundliche Grüsse
Tobias Buschor

shwups GmbH
Talstrasse 1
9000 St. Gallen

+41 76 321 23 21
shwups.ch


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/9#issuecomment-77879436

Received on Monday, 9 March 2015 15:48:18 UTC