- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:29:00 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 14:29:34 UTC
Hmm, yeah. I think those are good principles. They point me to both-cancels-fulfill or both-cancels-reject. Since both-cancels-fulfill loses information, I think that means we want both-cancels-reject. Although, even one-fulfills-one-rejects wouldn't necessarily violate any of those constraints. It would tell you whether you were the _first to cancel_, but not whether you were the "left" side of the tee or the right side. But, even that is a kind of information leakage between the two branches, so yeah, let's not do that. (BTW my mismatched .then + .catch was not intentional, both should be .then) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/302#issuecomment-84031723
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 14:29:34 UTC