- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:08:10 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 01:08:32 UTC
@martinthomson `doSomethingInnocuous()` already has a bug if `innocuousActivity()` ever rejects. I (believe I) differ from @jakearchibald in thinking that cancellation should always result in either a resolved or rejected `CancellablePromise`, rather than adding a third state, and if cancellation results in a rejection, then `doSomethingInnocuous()`'s rejection handler will get to do whatever it did in a pre-cancellation world. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/27#issuecomment-87136404
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 01:08:32 UTC