- From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:30:26 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 17:31:01 UTC
I haven't been convinced by this thread that we need to solve the general problem of transitive promise cancellation. That adds a lot of reference for a feature that will be rarely used. It's a poor analogy, but other multithreaded promise-like things don't have a generic cancellation. Read the c# documentation on the topic, for example. What is wrong with adding a simpler hook, solely for fetch use? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/27#issuecomment-87023372
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 17:31:01 UTC