Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661)

Removed `InstallEvent` interface and made it use `Extendable` interface for `install` events: 4d172287dc5f92530ac251f68a670f5f4de9540c.

> Hm, good point. Ideally .source should be a ServiceWorker.

Addressed: 5c715d1ccab03fa65b0b5a5c1de8fd4e63d5c8f2.


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/661#issuecomment-86381514

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 07:55:22 UTC