- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:20:21 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 11:20:51 UTC
I agree `registration.active` does the same role so we might want to drop `e.activeWorker`. In this case, we have a choice either use `ExtendableEvent` for `install` event as it doesn't have any attribute itself or still use `InstallEvent` for future extension. Another thing is, the only use case for this attribute I remember is the messaging between an installing worker and an active worker. But `registration.active.postMessage()` from a service worker doesn't fit to our SW messaging model sorted out to date. `e.source` set to a `Client` object seems not working here. I think we need to sort out the communication method between service workers somehow. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/661#issuecomment-85454624
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 11:20:51 UTC