Re: [streams] Performance Check vs. Node Streams (#304)

Before shipping an implementation and forcing API stagnation /
stabilization I truly believe we should profile this reference
implementation and be ABSOLUTELY sure the VM implementors have a chance to
check the profile of this API and not enter into a strange situation where
some minute point prevents performance.

Also, I truly hope we come up with resource finalization before that goes
out... I am still reeling from not being able to have a cancelation route
of promises.

It just seem premature and ignorant to talk about performance being able to
be optimized when no benchmark/profiling has been investigated.

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> One big performance *win* will be #97
> <https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/97>, which is explicitly being
> designed for.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/304#issuecomment-84266091>.
>


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/304#issuecomment-84456234