- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:05:35 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 07:06:01 UTC
> Technically, I don't think the service worker can be "recovered" once it reaches redundant state By "recovered", I just meant a new registration/update attempt. > I don't recall the details of the decision to make the worker that fails to activate still the active worker I don't recall them either. It'd been spec'ed to make the worker redundant and set the active worker to null. > Also, it seems right to fire "controllerchanged" in this case, no? Agreed. I'll address this. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/659#issuecomment-85886355
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 07:06:01 UTC