Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)

Hm. I can imagine this surprising devs in some cases, e.g., if they were writing a generic cache component, and it works 99% of the time, but then fails when Vary: * is there.

What do you mean by 'reject' -- i.e., is that an exception, silent failure...?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/656#issuecomment-87882233