- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 20:32:21 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 9 March 2015 03:32:49 UTC
> We should strive to maintain our existing high test coverage where possible. #288 went through every test and rewrote it to work with an EOS read() design. I'm not sure that work is portable to { value, done } + read() only existing on a reader. But we'll need to do something similar. Yeah. Let's use #288 for real work to be committed on the master. You've already done a lot there for async read() approach. > I think I will try to stick with the same underlying source interface we have now for ReadableStream? However it might be better to build on top of #287's I'm seeing that the suitable underlying source interface and delegates would be a little different from markReadable, ... etc. when adopted async read() model. Let me continue the prototyping to see more detailed picture. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/253#issuecomment-77795501
Received on Monday, 9 March 2015 03:32:49 UTC