Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289)

@tyoshino hmm that is an  interesting idea. I forgot that we had that trick up our sleeve, of packing up a byte length + a buffer into a single typed array. So people would access the underlying buffer with `result.buffer`? I guess that is OK.



---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/289#issuecomment-76813336

Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 20:36:22 UTC