- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:35:56 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 20:36:22 UTC
@tyoshino hmm that is an interesting idea. I forgot that we had that trick up our sleeve, of packing up a byte length + a buffer into a single typed array. So people would access the underlying buffer with `result.buffer`? I guess that is OK. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/289#issuecomment-76813336
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 20:36:22 UTC