Friday, 31 May 2013
- RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD]
- Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD]
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131)
- Resolutions for features at risk
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131)
- RE: json-ld-api use of Future (RDF-ISSUE-130)
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131)
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131)
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131)
- RDF-ISSUE-135 (gld-wg-review): GLD WG feedback on JSON-LD and API [JSON-LD Last Call 2]
Thursday, 30 May 2013
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers
- Re: bNodes as graph identifiers
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- RE: Another request for ReSpec help.
- Another request for ReSpec help.
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
Wednesday, 29 May 2013
Thursday, 30 May 2013
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Semantics edit after comments, and a request for ReSpec help.
Wednesday, 29 May 2013
- Re: Semantics edit after comments, and a request for ReSpec help.
- Semantics edit after comments, and a request for ReSpec help.
- RE: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Proposed resolution: Turtle feature at risk
- LC Review of the RDF 1.1. Semantics document
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
Tuesday, 28 May 2013
- json-ld-api use of Future (RDF-ISSUE-130)
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-28
- Re: comments on Semantics
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
- [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013
Monday, 27 May 2013
Sunday, 26 May 2013
Thursday, 23 May 2013
- Re: PLEASE VOTE on Turtle feature-at-risk: allow/diallow PREFIX & BASE
- Re: PLEASE VOTE on Turtle feature-at-risk: allow/diallow PREFIX & BASE
- PLEASE VOTE on Turtle feature-at-risk: allow/diallow PREFIX & BASE
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
- RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: votes by email
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
- Re: considering only interpretations with small domains in RDF entailment
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
- RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: minutes for 22 April teleconference
- votes by email
- Re: minutes for 22 April teleconference
- Syntax and Notation
- Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (process issue)
- Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
- minutes for 22 April teleconference
- considering only interpretations with small domains in RDF entailment
- Re: Agenda 22 May telecon
- Re: Agenda 22 May telecon
- Re: Agenda 22 May telecon
- RE: slides for "What's New in RDF 1.1"
- comments on Semantics
- comments / review of Concepts
- RE: Agenda 22 May telecon
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
- RDF-ISSUE-134 (JSON-LD blanknode properties and graph names): https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/221 [JSON-LD Last Call 2]
- RDF-ISSUE-133 (JSON-LD Reverse properties): Provisional support for Reverse properties [JSON-LD Last Call 2]
- Agenda 22 May telecon
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
- agenda to be posted in a few hours
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-21
- RDF-ISSUE-132 (LC2 - Booth - JSON-LD/RDF Alignment): JSON-LD should be more closely aligned with RDF [JSON-LD Last Call 2]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
Monday, 20 May 2013
- slides for "What's New in RDF 1.1"
- New draft of Semantics
- Funding kick-off for: Code for the Web - Linked Data and Web Payments
- Re: dogfood, was Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities
- Re: dogfood, was Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities
Sunday, 19 May 2013
Saturday, 18 May 2013
Friday, 17 May 2013
- dogfood, was Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities
- Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities
- Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
- RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs]
- fyi RDF dislikes, priorities
Thursday, 16 May 2013
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- rE: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
- Preview: KickStarter for Linked Data and Web Payments
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
- Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- xsd:string more general than I thought, was Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail
- Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
- Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: RDF WG Resolutions
- RDF WG Resolutions
- Re: Semantics and RDF graphs sharing blank nodes
- Re: Semantics and RDF graphs sharing blank nodes
- Semantics and RDF graphs sharing blank nodes
- Re: another edit of the Semantics....
- Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- another edit of the Semantics....
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
- Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LC2 publication snafu
- RDF-ISSUE-130 (LC2 - Hawke - Futures): Properly referencing the DOM Futures spec [JSON-LD Last Call 2]
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14
- RE: Agenda for 15 May 2013
- Re: Agenda for 15 May 2013
- Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- Re: Agenda for 15 May 2013
- Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- Re: Agenda for 15 May 2013
- Agenda for 15 May 2013
Monday, 13 May 2013
- RE: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- RE: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- RE: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 14th 2013
- RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- New draft of Semantics.
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 14th 2013
- Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- RDF-ISSUE-129 (LC2 - Sandro Hawke): JSON-LD xsd:integer lossless conversion [JSON-LD Last Call 2]
Sunday, 12 May 2013
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: Concepts Update small but important edit
Saturday, 11 May 2013
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Ruby JSON::LD implementation report
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
Friday, 10 May 2013
- json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer
- reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: MT draft
- Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: language tags
- Re: Concepts Update small but important edit
- Re: language tags
- Re: Concepts Update
- Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT)
- Re: language tags
- Re: Concepts Update
- Re: How to use Mercurial
- Re: Concepts Update small but important edit
- Re: MT draft
- Re: Concepts Update small but important edit
- MT draft
- How to use Mercurial
- mercurial (again)
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: Concepts Update small but important edit
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: Concepts Update small but important edit
- Re: issue-118 proposed text
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: issue-118 proposed text
- Re: minor editorial comments on rdf-concepts
- Minutes of 2013-05-08 telecon
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: Concepts Update
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- Intent to close ISSUE-223
- Action 201 - message to public-owl-comments about rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: Concepts Update
- Re: Concepts Update
- Re: Agenda 8 May telecon
- Re: Agenda 8 May telecon
- Re: Concepts Update
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- minor editorial comments on rdf-concepts
- RE: Agenda 8 May telecon
- Re: bad language tags
- RDF-ISSUE-128 (mandatory-profile): Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange - by Peter Ansell [JSON-LD Last Call 1]
- Re: bad language tags
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
- Re: Concepts Update
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-07
- Concepts Update
- Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Re: Agenda 8 May telecon
- Agenda 8 May telecon
- Re: Equality of rdf:langString
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: Equality of rdf:langString
- Abstract syntax VS concrete syntax [Was: Re: bad language tags]
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: bad language tags
- For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality.
- Equality of rdf:langString
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: Proposal: JSON-LD CR and LC2 timeline
- Re: bad language tags
- Proposal: JSON-LD CR and LC2 timeline
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 7th 2013
Monday, 6 May 2013
- Re: bad language tags
- Re: bad language tags
- bad language tags
- Re: RDF/S entailment rules.
- Re: RDF/S entailment rules.
- Re: RDF/S entailment rules.
- Re: RDF/S entailment rules.
- RE: RDF/S entailment rules.
- Re: RDF/S entailment rules.
Sunday, 5 May 2013
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- RDF/S entailment rules.
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
Saturday, 4 May 2013
Friday, 3 May 2013
- Re: How does RDF get extended to new datatypes?
- Re: Do IRIs indicate, identify, refer to, or denote datatypes?
- Re: issue-118 proposed text
- Re: issue-118 proposed text
- Do IRIs indicate, identify, refer to, or denote datatypes?
Thursday, 2 May 2013
- RE: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- RE: First implementation report for JSON-LD
- First implementation report for JSON-LD
- Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON
- Re: Fw: RDF/JSON
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC]
- Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON
Wednesday, 1 May 2013
- RE: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Re: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Minutes for May 1 telecon
- Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD
- Re: Agenda for 1 May 2013
- issue-118 proposed text
- Re: Proposed text for issue-118
- Issue-118 wording for Concepts, revized
- Moving Concepts to LC
- Re: Proposed text for issue-118
- Re: How does RDF get extended to new datatypes?
- CSV diversion
- Re: literals with \0
- Re: literals with \0
- Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON
- Re: Proposed text for issue-118
- Re: literals with \0
- literals with \0
- Re: Agenda for 1 May 2013
- Proposed text for issue-118