Re: another edit of the Semantics....

On 05/15/2013 03:18 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> I hope what it says about rdf:langString and xsd:string is correct. Ill-formed langStrings are impossilbe (because they would be syntax errors) but ill-formed xsd:strings*are*  possible, but very unlikely because no surface syntax could express them. Is that right?
>

I don't think that's right.

I'm pretty sure this is legal in every way:

<http://a.example/s> <http://a.example/p> '\u0000'^^eg:exampledatatype.

So this would be syntactically valid, but ill-typed:

<http://a.example/s> <http://a.example/p> '\u0000'.

     -- Sandro