Re: Agenda 22 May telecon

On 05/22/2013 05:01 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 21/05/13 23:16, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> See:
>>
>>    http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.05.22
>>
>> Guus
>>
>>
>
> Where are we on language tags?
>
> The discussion last week was squeezed down by blank nodes as named 
> graph labels.
>
> Please can we schedule discussions on blank nodes as named graph 
> labels (*if* ISSUE-131 is opened) at the end of calls.
>
>
> ** Proposal on language tags:
>
> 1/ RDF processors are not REQUIRED to recognize any datatype IRIs
>
> (removes text that adds "other than rdf:langString and xsd:string")
>
> 2/ rdf:langString
>
> Add as a proper subsection of section 5 of concepts.
>
> [[
> The value space associated with this datatype IRI is the set of all 
> pairs of strings and language tags.
> ]]
> -->
> [[
> The value space of rdf:langString is the set of pairs (string, 
> LC-lang) where LC-lang is a lowercase language tag.
> ]]
>
> This aligns with rdf:PlainLiteral.
>
> Semantics defines the special abstract syntax to value space mapping 
> for rdf:langString.
>
> 3/ xs:string
>
> concepts adds a proper subsection for xs:string to note that the value 
> space of xs:string excludes codepoint U+0000 and surrogate blocks, and 
> it is implementation-defined whether it aligns to XML 1.0 or XML 1.1
>
> (see Peter's comments re "Notes on xsd:string and binary data")
>

+1

So { <a> <b> "a"@fr, "a"@FR } is under part 2 of this proposal would be 
two triples.  Was it one under RDF 1.0?  Is it one in SPARQL?   (I 
probably don't have time to hunt down the spec text and test cases 
before the meeting; perhaps you know offhand.)

         -- Sandro

>     Andy
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 11:49:23 UTC