RE: json-ld-api use of Future (RDF-ISSUE-130)

On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:38 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Long, long, long story short....
> 
> We can go to CR referring to Futures as we're doing (pointing to Anne's
> what-wg text).  We should probably wait in CR (not going to PR) until
> someone (eg WebApps WG) takes on Futures and decides they're stable;
> that might be as little as 3 months from now.  If we give up on
> waiting,
> perhaps in October as the end of our charter looms, we'll probably have
> to copy the spec (literally or figuratively by pointing to an archival
> version).
> 
> We can talk this over in detail at the CR transition meeting.

Great! Thanks Sandro


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 19:47:19 UTC