- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:52:10 -0700
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I think that the document is very close to ready to go, and good enough to review. Remaining changes are: 1/ Need to fix up presentation - no section numbers when displaying - fonts too large when printing -> should use the stuff at the beginning of Concepts, I suspect 2/ Need to say what is normative - the intuitive summary subsection is not normative - may need to adjust method to conform with W3C rules 3/ Fix terminology from Concepts 3, first paragraph - remove RDF source and RDF term as neither are used in the document 5/ More care about blank nodes 4.1, first paragraph conventional logical notion, with only a local meaning. [shouldn't say local to a document] 12/ More fixes to B ... and to have a universe as large as the number of names and blank nodes from both the entailing and entailed sides. [I don't think that the plus-one is needed as there are no universals.] - There is nothing special about classes. They don't need to be considered in sizing. - Datatypes are different. The pre-interpretation of each infinite recognized datatype has to be at least N+B in size. [Actually you can do better by only counting values in the datatype as other literals don't contribute.] peter On 05/27/2013 07:12 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Pat, > > does it mean that I can start the more 'formal' review? Or you prefer to > wait for a nod from Peter? > > Thanks > > Ivan > > Pat Hayes wrote: >> Peter (and Ivan) >> >> New draft of Semantics incorporates corrections for most (all?) of your >> emailed comments. >> >> I'm not sure what you meant by it printing "too big" (?) I have added >> enough note formatting to make it readable without all the colors, but of >> course the background colors don't actually print. Do you think that is >> fatal? Apparently there is a clever CSS workaround involving very thick >> borders but I havn't mastered it yet. >> >> Some of the refs still don't exist in the ReSpec biblio file but I am >> presuming they will be there eventually. >> >> Pat >> >> On May 22, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 >> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile >> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 15:52:46 UTC