- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 00:45:36 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, "RDF-WG WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
On 22-05-13 19:10, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On 05/22/2013 12:56 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >> a Working Group is perfectly entitled to conduct a formal vote by >> email. In view of our time pressure, maybe this is one of those cases >> when we should not use telco time; indeed, I think all arguments pro >> and con have been already said and we should just close the issue in >> one way or other. >> >> Doing it this way (or not) is of course the chairs' decision. > > IMHO the key point here is that everyone who is participating in the WG > has a chance to participate in the decision. That requires clear > expectations. It seems to me some people don't read every email, > counting on the fact that decisions are made at meetings. Other people > don't come to meetings, counting on reading the agenda and/or > minutes. But we could set up new expectation and practices. > > Perhaps subject line starting "RDF-WG CONSENSUS CHECK" and always giving > them 7x24 hours. I was tied up tonight, but will send a message to this effect tomorrow. We can then record the decision at the next telecon (which is a bit less than 7x24, but should be ok). Guus > > -- Sandro > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 22:46:01 UTC