Re: Concepts Update

Hi all,

RDF Concepts [1] has been updated as required by my actions (this time correctly reflected):
- ACTION-257
- ACTION-258
- ACTION-259

Thanks to Eric P. for instructing me in the wily ways of hg merging.

Changes in this version are available at [2].

There are still two open issues and an unimplemented resolution:

1.  ISSUE: The Working Group intends to publish a Working Group Note detailing some of its efforts to define a formal semantics for RDF datasets. It should be referenced here when available. This is ACTION-209.  See [3].

The action is on Antoine.


2.  ISSUE: The Working Group intends to publish a separate Working Group Note entitled RDF 1.1 New Features and Migration Guide. This is ACTION-193. Some or all material in this section may be moved to that document. In the meantime, the Change Log is a good indication as to what else has changed and why.  See [4].

The action is on me.  I'll get to it as soon as I can, but suggest that this feature might be at risk unless I get a bit of help.


3.  RESOLUTION: The WG resolved [5] to include a diagram [6], which has not been included.  Should we update it or include it?  It seems to me that we lost the symmetry when we decided not to pursue RDF Spaces as a concept and, failing to replace it with anything, we should not include the diagram.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html
[2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#changes-wd3
[3] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#entailment
[4] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#changes
[5] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-08-22#resolution_2
[6] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/rdf-spaces-relationships.svg


On May 7, 2013, at 12:20, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I have updated Concepts in accordance with my actions:
> - ACTION-257
> - ACTION-288
> - ACTION-289
> …and also found some issues in the document that had been resolved but not reelected.  I'm pretty happy with the state of my copy.
> 
> However, I now see that there are multiple heads on the document (using 'hg heads') and I cannot merge.  An attempt to use 'hg log' did not go well.  I could use some help.
> 
> Can someone give me a hand with the merge?  Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
> 
> 
>