- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 10:21:30 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 05/08/2013 10:12 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> On May 7, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> RDF Concepts says:
>>
>> [[
>> Literal equality: Two literals are equal if and only if the two lexical forms, the two datatype IRIs, and the two language tags (if any) compare equal, character by character.
>> ]]
>>
>> I think it would be useful to spell out "term equality" and "value equality" as important concepts.
>>
> Blech. I strongly dislike having "kinds" of equality. Equality has one meaning, and it does not admit of degrees or kinds. This is a difference between literals and literal values, not two kinds of equality. We already draw out the distinction between literals and literal values.
+1
Something like: "Systems may compare literals terms for equality or they
may compare the _values_ those literals denote. Literals themselves are
equal if and only if ..... In contrast, the values of literals..."
>> RDF Concepts already defines "RDF term".
>>
>> [[
>> Literal term equality: Two literals are term-equals (the same RDF literal) if and only if the two lexical forms, the two datatype IRIs, and the two language tags (if any) compare equal, character by character.
>> ]]
>>
>> [[
>> Literal value equality: Two literals that are associated with the same value as said to be value-equals.
>>
>> Two literals can be value-equals without being the same term. For example:
>>
>> "1"^^xs:integer
>>
>> "01"^^xs:integer
>>
>> are assciated with the same value, but are not the same literal RDF terms and are not term-equals.
>> ]]
>>
>> ("associated" is the work used in 5.5 currently)
> Why not say "refer to" or "denotes", both of which are used throughout the spec? Why introduce another terminology?
+1 earlier in that section, we also use the term "represent"
- s
> Pat
>
>> Andy
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 14:21:39 UTC