Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131)

On 31/05/13 17:00, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On 05/29/2013 01:47 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
>> [ as a side note I find it bizarre that I'm having to advocate NOT
>> changing a 14
>> year old, industrially deployed spec, at the 11th hour of the
>> standardisation
>> process, to add a feature that's used by a tiny minority of deployed
>> systems -
>> if anything was to strike an outsider as peculiar about this WGs
>> process, it
>> would surely be this feature ]
>
> I don't understand this complaint at all.  This Working Group is
> chartered to provide a standard mechanism for working with and sharing
> multiple graphs.   In the chartering process in 2010, our various inputs
> all said this was a very high priority.   A lot of folks said to add
> Named Graphs or fix reification or something like that.

Specifically, blank nodes for graph names, not datasets in general.

	Andy

Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 16:55:55 UTC