- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:35:41 +0200
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Added to the agenda. Guus On 22-05-13 11:01, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 21/05/13 23:16, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> See: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.05.22 >> >> Guus >> >> > > Where are we on language tags? > > The discussion last week was squeezed down by blank nodes as named graph > labels. > > Please can we schedule discussions on blank nodes as named graph labels > (*if* ISSUE-131 is opened) at the end of calls. > > > ** Proposal on language tags: > > 1/ RDF processors are not REQUIRED to recognize any datatype IRIs > > (removes text that adds "other than rdf:langString and xsd:string") > > 2/ rdf:langString > > Add as a proper subsection of section 5 of concepts. > > [[ > The value space associated with this datatype IRI is the set of all > pairs of strings and language tags. > ]] > --> > [[ > The value space of rdf:langString is the set of pairs (string, LC-lang) > where LC-lang is a lowercase language tag. > ]] > > This aligns with rdf:PlainLiteral. > > Semantics defines the special abstract syntax to value space mapping for > rdf:langString. > > 3/ xs:string > > concepts adds a proper subsection for xs:string to note that the value > space of xs:string excludes codepoint U+0000 and surrogate blocks, and > it is implementation-defined whether it aligns to XML 1.0 or XML 1.1 > > (see Peter's comments re "Notes on xsd:string and binary data") > > Andy >
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 14:36:06 UTC