- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:40:55 -0700
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
It would be nice to have a pointer to the actual thing that is being decided, which I take to be the resolution of the feature at risk at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#grammar-production-sparqlPrefix This is ISSUE-89 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/89 peter PS: That said, I have no preference. :-) On 05/23/2013 08:03 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > All, > > We didn't have time at the last telecon to get to this during yesterday's > telecon. I would be very grateful if you could participate in an e-vote on > this issue via the WBS poll at: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46168/at-sign/ > > The poll is open until next Tuesday, end of the (Boston) day. > > Thanks, > Guus >
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 16:41:28 UTC