public-rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2013 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Agenda 22 May telecon (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Friday, 10 May)
• Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: language tags (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Equality of rdf:langString (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Tuesday, 7 May)
• For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Equality of rdf:langString (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: literals with \0 (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: literals with \0 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Concepts Update small but important edit (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Agenda 8 May telecon (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Abstract syntax VS concrete syntax [Was: Re: bad language tags] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: RDF/S entailment rules. (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: RDF/S entailment rules. (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: How does RDF get extended to new datatypes? (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Agenda for 1 May 2013 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Fw: RDF/JSON (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Agenda for 1 May 2013 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

• Re: Agenda 8 May telecon (Tuesday, 7 May)

Charles Greer

• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (Thursday, 30 May)
• Minutes for May 1 telecon (Wednesday, 1 May)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)

David Wood

• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Agenda for 15 May 2013 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Agenda for 15 May 2013 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Concepts Update small but important edit (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: language tags (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: How to use Mercurial (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Concepts Update small but important edit (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Concepts Update small but important edit (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: issue-118 proposed text (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: minor editorial comments on rdf-concepts (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Concepts Update (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Thursday, 2 May)
• Moving Concepts to LC (Wednesday, 1 May)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• rE: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Equality of rdf:langString (Tuesday, 7 May)
• CSV diversion (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: literals with \0 (Wednesday, 1 May)
• literals with \0 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Wednesday, 29 May)
• PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Monday, 6 May)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Semantics edit after comments, and a request for ReSpec help. (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Thursday, 16 May)
• RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• Ruby JSON::LD implementation report (Saturday, 11 May)
• Minutes of 2013-05-08 telecon (Wednesday, 8 May)
• First implementation report for JSON-LD (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD (Wednesday, 1 May)

Guus Schreiber

• Proposed resolution: Turtle feature at risk (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: PLEASE VOTE on Turtle feature-at-risk: allow/diallow PREFIX & BASE (Thursday, 23 May)
• PLEASE VOTE on Turtle feature-at-risk: allow/diallow PREFIX & BASE (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: votes by email (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Agenda 22 May telecon (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Agenda 22 May telecon (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 21 May)
• agenda to be posted in a few hours (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• Agenda 8 May telecon (Tuesday, 7 May)
• LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON (Wednesday, 1 May)

Ivan Herman

• LC Review of the RDF 1.1. Semantics document (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: comments on Semantics (Monday, 27 May)
• Re: minutes for 22 April teleconference (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (process issue) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: MT draft (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Proposal: JSON-LD CR and LC2 timeline (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: RDF/S entailment rules. (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Sunday, 5 May)
• Re: Proposed text for issue-118 (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Proposed text for issue-118 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Kingsley Idehen

• Syntax and Notation (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: dogfood, was Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Semantics and RDF graphs sharing blank nodes (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Thursday, 9 May)

Manu Sporny

• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-28 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 28th 2013 (Sunday, 26 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 23 May)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-21 (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Funding kick-off for: Code for the Web - Linked Data and Web Payments (Monday, 20 May)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 21st 2013 (Sunday, 19 May)
• Preview: KickStarter for Linked Data and Web Payments (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LC2 publication snafu (Tuesday, 14 May)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-14 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 14th 2013 (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-05-07 (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Proposal: JSON-LD CR and LC2 timeline (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 7th 2013 (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON (Thursday, 2 May)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Friday, 31 May)
• Resolutions for features at risk (Friday, 31 May)
• RE: json-ld-api use of Future (RDF-ISSUE-130) (Friday, 31 May)
• RE: Another request for ReSpec help. (Thursday, 30 May)
• RE: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 28th 2013 (Monday, 27 May)
• RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: slides for "What's New in RDF 1.1" (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: Agenda 22 May telecon (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: MT draft (Saturday, 18 May)
• RE: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• RE: Agenda for 15 May 2013 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• RE: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Monday, 13 May)
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, May 14th 2013 (Monday, 13 May)
• Intent to close ISSUE-223 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• RE: RDF/S entailment rules. (Monday, 6 May)
• RE: First implementation report for JSON-LD (Thursday, 2 May)
• RE: First implementation report for JSON-LD (Thursday, 2 May)
• RE: Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Conversion of lists of lists to JSON-LD (Wednesday, 1 May)

Pat Hayes

• Another request for ReSpec help. (Thursday, 30 May)
• Semantics edit after comments, and a request for ReSpec help. (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: comments on Semantics (Sunday, 26 May)
• Re: considering only interpretations with small domains in RDF entailment (Wednesday, 22 May)
• New draft of Semantics (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Semantics and RDF graphs sharing blank nodes (Wednesday, 15 May)
• another edit of the Semantics.... (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Agenda for 15 May 2013 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• New draft of Semantics. (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: MT draft (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Language tags as values - document consequences (Concepts and MT) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: language tags (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Concepts Update small but important edit (Friday, 10 May)
• MT draft (Friday, 10 May)
• How to use Mercurial (Friday, 10 May)
• mercurial (again) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Concepts Update small but important edit (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: issue-118 proposed text (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Agenda 8 May telecon (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Concepts Update (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Tuesday, 7 May)
• bad language tags (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: RDF/S entailment rules. (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: RDF/S entailment rules. (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Sunday, 5 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Sunday, 5 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Sunday, 5 May)
• RDF/S entailment rules. (Sunday, 5 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: Do IRIs indicate, identify, refer to, or denote datatypes? (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: issue-118 proposed text (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: LC drafts of Concepts and Semantics [was: Moving Concepts to LC] (Thursday, 2 May)
• issue-118 proposed text (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Issue-118 wording for Concepts, revized (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Proposed text for issue-118 (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Proposed text for issue-118 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: comments on Semantics (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: PLEASE VOTE on Turtle feature-at-risk: allow/diallow PREFIX & BASE (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: minutes for 22 April teleconference (Wednesday, 22 May)
• minutes for 22 April teleconference (Wednesday, 22 May)
• considering only interpretations with small domains in RDF entailment (Wednesday, 22 May)
• comments on Semantics (Wednesday, 22 May)
• comments / review of Concepts (Wednesday, 22 May)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• Semantics and RDF graphs sharing blank nodes (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: bad language tags (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Action 201 - message to public-owl-comments about rdf:plainLiteral (Wednesday, 8 May)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Tuesday, 14 May)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-135 (gld-wg-review): GLD WG feedback on JSON-LD and API [JSON-LD Last Call 2] (Friday, 31 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-134 (JSON-LD blanknode properties and graph names): https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/221 [JSON-LD Last Call 2] (Tuesday, 21 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-133 (JSON-LD Reverse properties): Provisional support for Reverse properties [JSON-LD Last Call 2] (Tuesday, 21 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-132 (LC2 - Booth - JSON-LD/RDF Alignment): JSON-LD should be more closely aligned with RDF [JSON-LD Last Call 2] (Tuesday, 21 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Friday, 17 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-130 (LC2 - Hawke - Futures): Properly referencing the DOM Futures spec [JSON-LD Last Call 2] (Tuesday, 14 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-129 (LC2 - Sandro Hawke): JSON-LD xsd:integer lossless conversion [JSON-LD Last Call 2] (Monday, 13 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-128 (mandatory-profile): Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange - by Peter Ansell [JSON-LD Last Call 1] (Wednesday, 8 May)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Keeping PrEfIx and BaSe Proposals (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Semantics edit after comments, and a request for ReSpec help. (Thursday, 30 May)
• json-ld-api use of Future (RDF-ISSUE-130) (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: [All] Agenda for 29 May 2013 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Wednesday, 22 May)
• votes by email (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: PrEfIx and BaSe should be removed from Turtle (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Agenda 22 May telecon (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 21 May)
• slides for "What's New in RDF 1.1" (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: dogfood, was Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities (Monday, 20 May)
• dogfood, was Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: fyi RDF dislikes, priorities (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-131 (mobile-datasets): How can one create an RDF dataset without being a web server? [RDF Graphs] (Friday, 17 May)
• fyi RDF dislikes, priorities (Friday, 17 May)
• xsd:string more general than I thought, was Re: RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Google adds JSON-LD support to Gmail (Thursday, 16 May)
• RDF Design (Complaint) FAQ (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: another edit of the Semantics.... (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Agenda for 15 May 2013 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• RDF-ISSUE-129 Re: json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Sunday, 12 May)
• json-ld-api: change proposal for handling of xs:integer (Friday, 10 May)
• reconsidering: blank nodes as named-graph labels (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: For RDF Concepts: term-equality and value-equality. (Wednesday, 8 May)
• minor editorial comments on rdf-concepts (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: First implementation report for JSON-LD (Thursday, 2 May)

Steve Harris

• bNodes as graph identifiers (Wednesday, 29 May)

Thomas Baker

• Re: issue-118 proposed text (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: issue-118 proposed text (Friday, 3 May)
• Do IRIs indicate, identify, refer to, or denote datatypes? (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: How does RDF get extended to new datatypes? (Wednesday, 1 May)

William Waites

• Re: RDF WG Resolutions (Wednesday, 15 May)

Yves Raimond

• RE: Agenda 8 May telecon (Wednesday, 8 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2013 22:44:22 UTC