ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2007 by date

Sunday, 30 September 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Coding vs ETags Henrik Nordstrom
NEW ISSUE: Content-Coding vs ETags Julian Reschke

Saturday, 29 September 2007

Status, Vancouver Mark Nottingham
Re: new issue: remove redundant MUST obey xrefs Julian Reschke

Friday, 28 September 2007

Re: range header query Henrik Nordstrom
new issue: remove redundant MUST obey xrefs Roy T. Fielding
range header query srirama chandra sekhar
Request to join http-wg Yahoo! Groups Notification

Tuesday, 18 September 2007

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-snell-http-prefer-00.txt] James M Snell

Saturday, 15 September 2007

NEW ISSUE: normative references Julian Reschke
Re: Revised charter proposal Julian Reschke

Thursday, 13 September 2007

Revised charter proposal Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 12 September 2007

Tuesday, 11 September 2007

Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)) Nicolas Williams
Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Shumon Huque
Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Keith Moore
RE: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Debbie Garside
Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Keith Moore
Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Ned Freed
Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Keith Moore
RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Ned Freed
RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Debbie Garside

Monday, 10 September 2007

Sunday, 9 September 2007

Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Bill Manning
Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Marshall Eubanks
Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Iljitsch van Beijnum

Monday, 10 September 2007

RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Travis Snoozy

Sunday, 9 September 2007

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Travis Snoozy
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Mark Baker
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Adrien de Croy
Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Jamie Lokier
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Jamie Lokier
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Adrien de Croy
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Travis Snoozy
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Jamie Lokier

Saturday, 8 September 2007

Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Bernard Aboba
Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Eric Rescorla
Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt) Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Adrien de Croy
Fwd: semantic error in RFC 2616 Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 7 September 2007

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Travis Snoozy
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Jamie Lokier
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Travis Snoozy
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] James M Snell
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] James M Snell
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Jamie Lokier
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Julian Reschke

Thursday, 6 September 2007

RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland
Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Third proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Mark Nottingham
Re: Fwd: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Third proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Anne van Kesteren
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Julian Reschke
Fwd: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Third proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 5 September 2007

RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
Fwd: update "Authoritative Metadata"/ contentTypeOverride-24 based on HTML 5 spec? Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 4 September 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE (?): LINK header Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE (?): LINK header Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE (?): LINK header Mark Nottingham

Monday, 3 September 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE (?): LINK header Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE (?): LINK header Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 2 September 2007

NEW ISSUE (?): LINK header Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

Saturday, 1 September 2007

RE: Custom Ranges Henrik Nordstrom

Friday, 31 August 2007

RE: Custom Ranges Larry Masinter
HTTPBis scope: cookies & TLS Larry Masinter
Fwd: [Fwd: Less drafty: RFC 2617 for OAuth] Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 30 August 2007

RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] James M Snell
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Yaron Goland

Wednesday, 29 August 2007

Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Henrik Nordstrom
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Henrik Nordstrom
RE: Custom Ranges Yaron Goland

Tuesday, 28 August 2007

Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Keith Moore
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Keith Moore
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] Julian Reschke

Monday, 27 August 2007

Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? John Leslie
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
Re: thinking about etags Julian Reschke
RE: thinking about etags Henrik Nordstrom

Sunday, 26 August 2007

Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis

Saturday, 25 August 2007

[Fwd: Nomcom 2007-8: Please nominate candidates for IESG and IAB positions (Deadline: Sep 10, 2007)] Alexey Melnikov

Friday, 24 August 2007

Custom Ranges Kornel Lesinski
RE: Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a 2xx code? Yves Lafon
RE: Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a 2xx code? Mike Dierken

Thursday, 23 August 2007

RE: Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a 2xx code? Yaron Goland
Re: thinking about etags Yves Lafon

Wednesday, 22 August 2007

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt] James M Snell
Re: Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a 2xx code? Henrik Nordstrom
Re: thinking about etags Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Henrik Nordstrom
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Henrik Nordstrom

Tuesday, 21 August 2007

Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Keith Moore
Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis
RE: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Robert Brewer
Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis
RE: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Robert Brewer

Monday, 20 August 2007

Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Keith Moore
Re: Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a 2xx code? Julian Reschke
Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a 2xx code? Yaron Goland
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] der Mouse
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] John C Klensin
Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter forhttp-bis] Keith Moore
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Clive D.W. Feather
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Clive D.W. Feather
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Mark Nottingham
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Martin Duerst
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Mark Nottingham
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter forhttp-bis] Martin Duerst
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Martin Duerst
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Clive D.W. Feather
Re: Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Keith Moore
Conneg for media types [was: HTTP Information Request] Mark Nottingham
RE: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Robert Brewer
Re: Warnings James M Snell
Character encodings in headers [i74][was: Straw-man charter for http-bis] Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Mark Nottingham
Re: Clarification of the term "deflate" Mark Nottingham
Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Mark Nottingham
Warnings Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Mark Nottingham
Re: Message delimiting security issues Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Mark Nottingham
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 19 August 2007

Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis

Saturday, 18 August 2007

RE: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Robert Brewer
Re: thinking about etags Roy T. Fielding
Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Definition of "variant" and "requested variant", was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: Definition of "variant" and "requested variant", was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
RE: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Robert Brewer
thinking about etags Larry Masinter
Re: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Definition of "variant" and "requested variant", was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: Definition of "variant" and "requested variant", was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 17 August 2007

RE: [RFC] Optional header negotitation Robert Brewer
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Hugo Haas
Definition of "variant" and "requested variant", was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
[RFC] Optional header negotitation Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Julian Reschke
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Stefan Eissing
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Julian Reschke
RE: Clarification of the term "deflate" Paul Marquess
Re: WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Mark Nottingham

Monday, 13 August 2007

Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Roy T. Fielding
Re: Trailers and intermediaries Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Trailers and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Henrik Nordstrom
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Leif Johansson
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Sunday, 12 August 2007

Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Jamie Lokier
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Jamie Lokier
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Julian Reschke

Saturday, 11 August 2007

Re: Revised charter proposal Alexey Melnikov
HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2817/2818 be in scope for the WG? Alexey Melnikov
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Jamie Lokier

Friday, 10 August 2007

Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Lisa Dusseault
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations David Morris
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Mark Baker
Re: Patch options -- summary of recent conversations Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Leif Johansson
Patch options -- summary of recent conversations James M Snell
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Leif Johansson
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Resend: HTTP Performance extension for NAV(network-based anti-virus) systems Babu.N

Thursday, 9 August 2007

Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: Clarification of the term "deflate" David Morris
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Jamie Lokier
Re: Clarification of the term "deflate" Jamie Lokier
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Jamie Lokier
Re: Clarification of the term "deflate" Henrik Nordstrom
New issue: 15.3 misguided? Henrik Nordstrom

Wednesday, 8 August 2007

Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Jeffrey Mogul
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Justin Erenkrantz
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND James M Snell
Re: revised I-D draft-decroy-http-progress-01 Adrien de Croy
RE: Clarification of the term "deflate" Paul Marquess
Re: Metalink: higher availability and self repairing downloads Anthony Bryan

Tuesday, 7 August 2007

Re: Clarification of the term "deflate" Roy T. Fielding
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Julian Reschke
RE: Clarification of the term "deflate" Henrik Nordstrom
RE: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Eric Lawrence
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Lisa Dusseault
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Lisa Dusseault
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Alexey Melnikov
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Alexey Melnikov
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry James M Snell
RE: Clarification of the term "deflate" Paul Marquess
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Clarification of the term "deflate" Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: revised I-D draft-decroy-http-progress-01 Julian Reschke
Clarification of the term "deflate" Paul Marquess
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Jamie Lokier
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Julian Reschke
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Roy T. Fielding
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND James M Snell
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry James M Snell
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 6 August 2007

Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Adrien de Croy
Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Julian Reschke
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke
New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: Resend: HTTP Performance extension for NAV(network-based anti-virus) systems Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Adrien de Croy
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Resend: HTTP Performance extension for NAV(network-based anti-virus) systems Adrien de Croy
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
Re: Fodder for security issues document (was: dns binding) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Roy T. Fielding
Re: Fodder for security issues document (was: dns binding) David Morris
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Julian Reschke
Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Julian Reschke
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc James M Snell
New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND Henrik Nordstrom
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Henrik Nordstrom
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Fodder for security issues document (was: dns binding) Henrik Nordstrom

Saturday, 4 August 2007

Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Julian Reschke

Friday, 3 August 2007

Re: Draft minutes from HTTPBis BOF Alexey Melnikov
Re: Draft minutes from HTTPBis BOF Lisa Dusseault
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc James M Snell
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Mark Baker
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Cyrus Daboo
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Mark Baker
Re: Draft minutes from HTTPBis BOF Julian Reschke
Re: Resend: HTTP Performance extension for NAV(network-based anti-virus) systems Babu.N
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Stefan Eissing
Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc Julian Reschke
PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc James M Snell
revised I-D draft-decroy-http-progress-01 Adrien de Croy
Re: Resend: HTTP Performance extension for NAV(network-based anti-virus) systems Adrien de Croy

Thursday, 2 August 2007

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Yaron Goland
Fodder for security issues document (was: dns binding) Lisa Dusseault
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Stefan Eissing
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Stefan Eissing
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Stefan Eissing
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] James M Snell
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] James M Snell
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Mark Baker

Wednesday, 1 August 2007

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Roy T. Fielding
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Mark Baker
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Roy T. Fielding
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Lisa Dusseault
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Mark Baker
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Roy T. Fielding
Re: Draft minutes from HTTPBis BOF Dave Kristol

Tuesday, 31 July 2007

Draft minutes from HTTPBis BOF Alexey Melnikov
Re: BoF Summary Alexey Melnikov

Wednesday, 1 August 2007

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Mark Baker
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Henrik Nordstrom
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 31 July 2007

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Henrik Nordstrom
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Henrik Nordstrom
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Lisa Dusseault
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Lisa Dusseault
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Mark Baker
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Lisa Dusseault
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Lisa Dusseault
NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Lisa Dusseault

Monday, 30 July 2007

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-get-location-00.txt Julian Reschke

Friday, 27 July 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Jeffrey Mogul
RE: Revised charter proposal Larry Masinter
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT James M Snell
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] James M Snell
Re: Revised charter proposal Marcelo Schmidt
Re: Revised charter proposal Julian Reschke
Re: Revised charter proposal Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Jamie Lokier

Thursday, 26 July 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Julian Reschke
Resend: HTTP Performance extension for NAV(network-based anti-virus) systems babun@intoto.com
[ietf-http-wg] <none> babun@intoto.com
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Stefanos Harhalakis
Revised charter proposal Mark Nottingham
BoF Summary Mark Nottingham
WWW-Authenticate, Authorization and 401's Hugo Haas

Wednesday, 25 July 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Roy T. Fielding
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Mark Nottingham
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems David Morris
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Mark Nottingham
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Mark Baker
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Bjoern Hoehrmann
NEW ISSUE: Content-* headers vs PUT Julian Reschke
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Mark Baker
Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] James M Snell
Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 24 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems David Morris

Monday, 23 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Roy T. Fielding
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt] James M Snell
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Jeffrey Mogul
Re: Draft agenda for the HTTPBis BOF Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 21 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Julian Reschke

Friday, 20 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Roy T. Fielding
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Thursday, 19 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Jeffrey Mogul

Wednesday, 18 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Jamie Lokier
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 17 July 2007

Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
RE: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Eric Lawrence
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Jamie Lokier
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Travis Snoozy
RE: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Eric Lawrence
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Travis Snoozy
Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Justin Erenkrantz
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: clarify "requested variant" Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 16 July 2007

Re: PATCH draft James M Snell
Re: PATCH draft Mark Baker
Re: status registry missing code 506 Alexey Melnikov

Sunday, 15 July 2007

Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis

Saturday, 14 July 2007

status registry missing code 506 Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 13 July 2007

NEW ISSUE: clarify "requested variant" Julian Reschke
NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 Julian Reschke

Thursday, 12 July 2007

Internet-Drafts Posted Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
PATCH draft James M Snell

Wednesday, 11 July 2007

Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Travis Snoozy
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Mark Nottingham
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee

Tuesday, 10 July 2007

Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Roy T. Fielding
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee

Monday, 9 July 2007

Draft agenda for the HTTPBis BOF Alexey Melnikov

Friday, 6 July 2007

Metalink: higher availability and self repairing downloads Anthony Bryan
Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke

Thursday, 5 July 2007

Re: PATCH Draft Lisa Dusseault
Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: Some comments on the PATCH draft James M Snell
Re: Some comments on the PATCH draft Andreas Sewe
Re: PATCH Draft Mark Baker

Wednesday, 4 July 2007

Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-03.txt Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH Draft Lisa Dusseault
Re: PATCH Draft David Morris
Re: PATCH Draft Mark Baker
Re: Some comments on the PATCH draft Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Anthony Bryan

Tuesday, 3 July 2007

Re: Some comments on the PATCH draft Roy T. Fielding
RE: Some comments on the PATCH draft Yaron Goland
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Anthony Bryan
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Travis Snoozy
RE: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Joris Dobbelsteen
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Mark Baker
Re: Some comments on the PATCH draft Stefan Eissing
Some comments on the PATCH draft Andreas Sewe
RE: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Larry Masinter
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Mark Nottingham
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee
Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Roy T. Fielding
RE: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Eric Lawrence

Monday, 2 July 2007

Re: Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Jeffrey Mogul
Standardizing Firefox's Implementation of Link Fingerprints Edward Lee
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
Re: Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. SiM

Sunday, 1 July 2007

Re: Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. Mike Dierken

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2007 21:16:11 UTC