- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:15:18 +1200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > > Adrien de Croy wrote: >> >> greatly simplified, and deals now purely with progress notifications. >> ... > > Adrien, > > I think you'll need an I18N section. OK. I presume there is some standard for defining internationalised strings? like UTF-8 or something similar to what is used in certain email headers. > > Also, they way you define the headers in terms of RFC4234, parsing > will be different from headers defined in RFC2616 (wrt to LWS...) Is > this intended? probably not. I'd intended only a single WS (designated by the "SP") but I'm not up to date with RFC4234. I understand the parsing of HTTP was modified with 1.1 to allow pretty much any amount of contiguous WS to be treated as SP? thanks Adrien > > Best regards, Julian > -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 11:13:42 UTC