- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:59:38 +0200
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On mån, 2007-08-06 at 17:28 -0700, James M Snell wrote: >> I don't see what this would buy us. > > - Coordination between HTTP extensions, and avoidance of duplicate work. Yes. > - An easier path for people to find the meaning of a method without > everyone having to index the RFCs themselves. Also, avoiding that people white-list HTTP methods and then forget some (yes, Microsoft & Opera, I'm talking to you! :-). BTW, there's <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/common-index.html#rfc.index.M>. But of course that's not a substitute for a proper registry. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 16:00:02 UTC