I suppose the proxy *could* issue a subsequent GET, it would just be impossible to ensure that the result is accurate. E.g. the resource might be modified between the initial response and the subsequent GET, which somewhat defeats the purpose of the 209 response (at least when used with PATCH). I'm not sure we'd want to encourage this behavior at all, even in highly controlled environments. - James Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On tor, 2007-08-02 at 23:18 -0700, James M Snell wrote: > >> the client rather than the complete original response. If the request >> contains 209-content-returned and the server responds with 200 or 204 >> (or whatever), then it obviously will not be capable of fulfilling the >> preference and must ignore it. > > Can't it? What stops the proxy from issuing a GET in that case and > returning the 200 response as a 209? > > Note: Not saying it's generally a good thing or even desired for a proxy > to do, and only makes sense in very special controlled deployments. > > Regards > HenrikReceived on Monday, 6 August 2007 17:46:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:14 UTC