James M Snell wrote: > I suppose the proxy *could* issue a subsequent GET, it would just be > impossible to ensure that the result is accurate. E.g. the resource > might be modified between the initial response and the subsequent GET, > which somewhat defeats the purpose of the 209 response (at least when > used with PATCH). I'm not sure we'd want to encourage this behavior at > all, even in highly controlled environments. > ... That could be handled using "If-Match", right? Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 6 August 2007 17:56:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:31 UTC