Re: PATCH, Expect, Prefer, etc

James M Snell wrote:
> I suppose the proxy *could* issue a subsequent GET, it would just be
> impossible to ensure that the result is accurate.  E.g. the resource
> might be modified between the initial response and the subsequent GET,
> which somewhat defeats the purpose of the 209 response (at least when
> used with PATCH).  I'm not sure we'd want to encourage this behavior at
> all, even in highly controlled environments.
 > ...

That could be handled using "If-Match", right?

Best regards, Julian