- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:55:59 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
James M Snell wrote: > I suppose the proxy *could* issue a subsequent GET, it would just be > impossible to ensure that the result is accurate. E.g. the resource > might be modified between the initial response and the subsequent GET, > which somewhat defeats the purpose of the 209 response (at least when > used with PATCH). I'm not sure we'd want to encourage this behavior at > all, even in highly controlled environments. > ... That could be handled using "If-Match", right? Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 17:56:24 UTC