Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry

Heh.. I guess I'd just as soon read the RFC's :-) ... but I understand
your point.

- James

Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> On mån, 2007-08-06 at 17:28 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
>>> I don't see what this would buy us.
>>
>> - Coordination between HTTP extensions, and avoidance of duplicate work.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> - An easier path for people to find the meaning of a method without
>> everyone having to index the RFCs themselves.
> 
> Also, avoiding that people white-list HTTP methods and then forget some
> (yes, Microsoft & Opera, I'm talking to you! :-).
> 
> BTW, there's
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/common-index.html#rfc.index.M>. But of
> course that's not a substitute for a proper registry.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> 
> 
>