On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > Regarding the new proposed "209 Content Returned" status code. > > I think recent discussions show that there is actually a need for two > new status codes. > > 209 Content Retuned okay, but only if it is forbidden as a response to GET. There is no need to make any special reference to Vary or Cache-control -- just define all fields to be interpreted as if the request method had been GET. > 210 Information returned No way. That is what Content-Location provides. We don't need a Content-Etag header field -- the Etag response header field would always have the same value. ....RoyReceived on Monday, 6 August 2007 20:11:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:31 UTC