- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:35:07 +0100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi folks, Answers to this question during the BOF were not conclusive, so I would like to poll mailing list members on whether revision of RFC 2965 (HTTP State Management Mechanism) should be in scope for the proposed WG. Question: Should RFC 2965 revision be in scope for the WG? Please chose one of the following answers: 1). No 2). Yes 3). Maybe (this includes "yes, but when the WG completes the currently proposed milestones" and "yes, but this should be done in another WG") 4). I have another opinion, which is .... Please send answers to the mailing list, or directly to me *and* Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>. And of course feel free to ask clarifying questions/correct list of answers.
Received on Saturday, 11 August 2007 16:34:13 UTC