- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:40:06 -0700
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yeah it seems pretty clear now that 404 is the right answer. I think my internal spec lawyer just went looney. > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:henrik@henriknordstrom.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:12 PM > To: Yaron Goland > Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Should a DELETE against a non-existent resource return a > 2xx code? > > On mån, 2007-08-20 at 10:05 -0700, Yaron Goland wrote: > > > What’s the opinion of the working group? > > I would prefer 404. It's quite likely useful to the client to know that > the object wasn't found by the server. > > 404 is also in line with how servers respond to other requests for > non-existing resources. > > Regards > Henrik
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 16:40:18 UTC