- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:25:06 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: jasnell@us.ibm.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > We could certainly add "Content-Range header MUST not appear in a PATCH > request". That could even be overridden by a future spec that uses the > Content-Range header (and other directives, to be sure) to extend PATCH > to replace certain ranges of the resource being updated. > > Did you have a recommendation for the Content-Range header? No, I just want to make sure that *if* a spec makes mandatory requirements on the server treatment of an entire class of headers, it also defines how to implement them. So what about Content-MD5? Any requirements above what RFC2616 says? Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:25:29 UTC