- From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:36:16 +0000
- To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote: >> >>Question: Should RFC 2817 and/or RFC 2818 revision be in scope for the >>WG? >> >>Please chose one of the following answers: >> >>1). No >>2). Yes, only add RFC 2818bis to the charter >>3). Yes, only add RFC 2817bis to the charter >>4). Yes, add both RFC 2817bis and RFC 2818bis to the charter >>5). Maybe (this includes "yes, but when the WG completes the currently >>proposed milestones" and "yes, but this should be done in another WG") >>6). I have another opinion, which is .... I tend towards 1) no. It's not obvious that TLS is central to this work: before we add what looks like a can of worms, we'd better be sure it's needed. -- John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 21:31:40 UTC