- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:23:09 +0100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi folks, > Answers to this question during the BOF were not conclusive, so I > would like to poll mailing list members on whether revision of RFC > 2965 (HTTP State Management Mechanism) should be in scope for the > proposed WG. > > Question: Should RFC 2965 revision be in scope for the WG? > > Please chose one of the following answers: > > 1). No > 2). Yes > 3). Maybe (this includes "yes, but when the WG completes the currently > proposed milestones" and "yes, but this should be done in another WG") > 4). I have another opinion, which is .... > > Please send answers to the mailing list, or directly to me *and* Mark > Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>. > And of course feel free to ask clarifying questions/correct list of > answers. If you haven't replied to this question, please send your replies by September 3rd. Thanks, Alexey
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 20:22:34 UTC