W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: HTTPBis BOF followup - should RFC 2965 (cookie) be in scope for the WG?

From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:23:09 +0100
Message-ID: <46D332AD.5070702@isode.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
CC: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Hi folks,
> Answers to this question during the BOF were not conclusive, so I 
> would like to poll mailing list members on whether revision of RFC 
> 2965 (HTTP State Management Mechanism) should be in scope for the 
> proposed WG.
> Question: Should RFC 2965 revision be in scope for the WG?
> Please chose one of the following answers:
> 1). No
> 2). Yes
> 3). Maybe (this includes "yes, but when the WG completes the currently 
> proposed milestones" and "yes, but this should be done in another WG")
> 4). I have another opinion, which is ....
> Please send answers to the mailing list, or directly to me *and* Mark 
> Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>.
> And of course feel free to ask clarifying questions/correct list of 
> answers.

If you haven't replied to this question, please send your replies by 
September 3rd.

Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 20:22:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:31 UTC