Re: revised I-D draft-decroy-http-progress-01

Adrien de Croy wrote:
> 
> greatly simplified, and deals now purely with progress notifications.
> ...

Adrien,

I think you'll need an I18N section.

Also, they way you define the headers in terms of RFC4234, parsing will 
be different from headers defined in RFC2616 (wrt to LWS...) Is this 
intended?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 14:34:15 UTC