Adrien de Croy wrote: > > greatly simplified, and deals now purely with progress notifications. > ... Adrien, I think you'll need an I18N section. Also, they way you define the headers in terms of RFC4234, parsing will be different from headers defined in RFC2616 (wrt to LWS...) Is this intended? Best regards, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 14:34:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:31 UTC