Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt]

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>> (*) So, what does "Content-Range" mean for PATCH?
> 
> I can certainly deal with something along these lines.  I agree this 
> kind of thing is poorly implemented and appreciate the testing.  If 2616 
> changes we could also change PATCH if the timing is right.
> 
> When should we attempt to have a HTTP Interop event?  A test suite like 
> LITMUS (in fact I think part of Litmus can be reused) would go a long 
> way towards alerting implementors to simple requirements that are easily 
> missed.  A test suite could attempt a PUT with "Content-BOGUS: MUST 
> FAIL" (assuming we kept this requirement) and expect to see at least 
> some kind of error if not a 501.

So again, what is the semantics of "Content-Range" in the context of PATCH?

Best regards, Julian