- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:29:32 -0400
- To: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 8/1/07, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > > So to be clear, are you now suggesting that a 200 PATCH response would > > *not* have this specific meaning, and that only this new response code > > would indicate that it did have it? If so, great, we're in sync. > > Yes. Great. So I'm going to propose that we add this response code to the PATCH draft. What does everyone think? Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 00:29:34 UTC