- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:48:48 +0200
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > ... > I suppose it could fit for WEBDAV as well, but don't understand the > fineprint of WEBDAT well enough to say if it fits well or not.. but I > guess not as WEBDAV is .. well.. different. > ... The only difference in WebDAV is that PROPFIND and PROPPATCH essentially add a second set of resources that share the same URIs as the "GETtable" content. As long as the definition of "requested variant" solely depends on the request headers, this is not an issue, except that you really can't use ETags as cache validators for properties. *Changing* "requested variant" to include method name and request body solves that issue, but IMHO causes lots of new problems. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 11:49:05 UTC