www-voice@w3.org from January to March 2003 by date

Friday, 28 March 2003

• RE: Question about VoiceXML Implementation Report and speech recognition Scott McGlashan
• RE: Comments on VoiceXML Version 2.0 Implementation Report (Version: Jan 23, 2003) Scott McGlashan
• Contribution of X+V 1.1 to the Multimodal Interaction Working Group Jim Larson

Thursday, 27 March 2003

• Question about VoiceXML Implementation Report and speech recognition Andras Micsik
• Comments on VoiceXML Version 2.0 Implementation Report (Version: Jan 23, 2003) Guillaume Berche

Wednesday, 26 March 2003

• Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 20 February 2003 (part 2) Guillaume Berche

Monday, 24 March 2003

• typo reports Greg FitzPatrick
• Organization of a prompt script in vxml - ssml Greg FitzPatrick

Friday, 21 March 2003

• Re: ABNF srgs Brad Porter
• Re: free toolkit Pavel Cenek
• free toolkit Silvia

Thursday, 13 March 2003

• RE: Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 20 February 2003 Scott McGlashan
• Re: necessity of the <token> tag Krause, Stefan
• Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 20 February 2003 Guillaume Berche

Friday, 7 March 2003

• RE: comments on Voice XML from XML Schema Working Group Scott McGlashan
• comments on Voice XML from XML Schema Working Group C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Tuesday, 4 March 2003

• necessity of the <token> tag Bernd Kiefer

Friday, 28 February 2003

• ECMAScript reference Philippe Le Hegaret

Wednesday, 26 February 2003

• typographical error John_Voger@Vanguard.com

Tuesday, 25 February 2003

• [HTML version] RE: VIO Requirements draft and agenda for today Max Froumentin
• RE: VXML support for hearing impaired (TDD) Galpin, Mike

Friday, 21 February 2003

• RE: VoiceXML2: Examples Scott McGlashan
• RE: VXML support for hearing impaired (TDD) Scott McGlashan
• New VoiceXML Candidate Recommendation puslished Max Froumentin
• VXML support for hearing impaired (TDD) Bhaskar Narayanakere

Wednesday, 19 February 2003

• RE: Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 28 January 2003 (part 1 + 2) Matt Porter

Thursday, 20 February 2003

• Re: VoiceXML2: Examples Max Froumentin

Wednesday, 19 February 2003

• Re: VoiceXML2: Examples Al Gilman
• Re: VoiceXML2: Examples Max Froumentin

Monday, 17 February 2003

• Re: VoiceXML2: Examples Al Gilman
• VoiceXML2: Examples Max Froumentin

Wednesday, 12 February 2003

• [Walmsley] Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• RE: Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 28 January 2003 (part 1 + 2) Scott McGlashan
• Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 28 January 2003 (part 2) Guillaume Berche
• Comments on VXML Candidate Recommendation 28 January 2003 (part 1) Guillaume Berche

Tuesday, 11 February 2003

• XML Schema WG comments on SSML version 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Priscilla Walmsley

Saturday, 8 February 2003

• Voice Browser Narayan Annamalai
• RE: link metadata cannot override server media type Dan Connolly

Friday, 7 February 2003

• Re: link metadata cannot override server media type Brad Porter
• Re: link metadata cannot override server media type Chris Lilley
• RE: link metadata cannot override server media type Brad Porter
• RE: link metadata cannot override server media type Dan Connolly
• RE: link metadata cannot override server media type Scott McGlashan

Thursday, 6 February 2003

• link metadata cannot override server media type Dan Connolly
• RE: [Schwerdtfeger] Your comments on the 2002 SSML Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2001 and 2002 SSML Working Drafts Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2001 and 2002 SSML Last Call Working Drafts Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2001 and 2002 SSML Last Call Working Drafts Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2001 SSML Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the April 2002 SSML Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2002 SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your questions about the April 2002 SSML Working Draft Daniel Burnett
• Your comments on the 2001 SSML Working Draft Daniel Burnett

Wednesday, 5 February 2003

• Ask for clarification on VoiceXML 2.0 W3C Candidate Recommendation Arnaud VALLEE

Monday, 3 February 2003

• Re: Consolidated comments on SSML Martin Duerst

Saturday, 1 February 2003

• Consolidated comments on SSML Martin Duerst

Thursday, 30 January 2003

• Re: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Al Gilman
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification T. V. Raman

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Shires, Glen
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Janina Sajka
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Critical missing feature in SSML specification David Poehlman
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Shires, Glen
• Re: Critical missing feature in SSML specification David Poehlman
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Shires, Glen
• RE: Critical missing feature in SSML specification Alex.Monaghan@Aculab.com
• Critical missing feature in SSML specification Richard Schwerdtfeger

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

• Re: CCXML and in-band announcements RJ Auburn

Monday, 27 January 2003

• CCXML and in-band announcements ferreiro_j@tsm.es

Friday, 24 January 2003

• RE: [SSML Last Call] "say-as" element creates under-modeled marku p Alex.Monaghan@Aculab.com
• [SSML Last Call] "say-as" element creates under-modeled markup Al Gilman

Thursday, 23 January 2003

• some WAI comments on SSML Al Gilman

Wednesday, 22 January 2003

• Speech to Text? Narayan Annamalai
• Comments on SSML Draft Andrew Thompson

Tuesday, 21 January 2003

• clarification on mode/namelist attribute of filled element Arnaud VALLEE
• Re: error.badfetch on non existent root document (bis) Pavel Cenek
• error.badfetch on non existent root document (bis) Arnaud VALLEE
• Re: Clarification on blind transfer ( is needed ) Ken Rehor
• Re: SSML <break time="none"/> Marc Schroeder
• events and related data structures Shridhar Damle
• RE: SSML <break time="none"/> Alex.Monaghan@Aculab.com
• SSML <break time="none"/> Marc Schroeder

Monday, 20 January 2003

• Voice Shopping Application on Mobile Phones!! redske@tiac.net

Friday, 17 January 2003

• RE: Clarification on blind transfer ( is needed ) Teemu Tingander

Thursday, 16 January 2003

• Clarification on blind transfer Arnaud VALLEE
• SSML 2.3.2 mark Element. Clarification please David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
• Comments for SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Susan Lesch

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

• SI literals (SRGS/SISR) Carl Mitchell

Monday, 13 January 2003

• Re: [cc] Questions on CCXML Working Draft 2 dated 11 October 2002 RJ Auburn

Sunday, 12 January 2003

• Re: help request VoiceXML Italian User Group
• help request VoiceXML Italian User Group
• Help request about <goto> VoiceXML Italian User Group

Thursday, 9 January 2003

• error.badfetch on non existent root document Arnaud VALLEE

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

• ABNF: "public" does too much jim jackson

Monday, 6 January 2003

• Questions on CCXML 11 October 2002 spec Chris Parrinello

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• Re: CCXML Draft 2002011 RJ Auburn

Last message date: Friday, 28 March 2003 09:57:07 UTC