www-tag@w3.org from February 2010 by date

Sunday, 28 February 2010

• spoofing and IRIs Larry Masinter

Friday, 26 February 2010

• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar Dan Connolly

Thursday, 25 February 2010

• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 25 February 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 25 February 2010 Jonathan Rees
• ACTION-376: Content Transformation Guidelines Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group
• Agenda for TAG teleconference of 25 February 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar Dan Connolly
• client-side storage APIs and RDFa API? Dan Connolly
• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: TAG Action-354 Review client-side storage API’s ashok malhotra
• Re: TAG Action-354 Review client-side storage API’s Dan Connolly
• Re: TAG Action-354 Review client-side storage API?s noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Fw: registries associated with URI schemes noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: TAG Action-354 Review client-side storage API?s ashok malhotra
• Re: TAG Action-354 Review client-side storage API?s noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Fw: [Fwd: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals] Dan Connolly
• Fw: [Fwd: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals] noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar Jonathan Rees

Tuesday, 23 February 2010

• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar David Booth
• ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar Jonathan Rees
• TAG Action-354 Review client-side storage API’s ashok malhotra
• Re: Revised draft minutes of call 28 January 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 19 February 2010

• Re: TAG 18 Feb teleconference minutes for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: TAG 18 Feb teleconference minutes for review Dan Connolly
• Re: TAG 18 Feb teleconference minutes for review noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 18 February 2010

• TAG 18 Feb teleconference minutes for review Dan Connolly
• Re: "confirm subscribe" use case for "secret URI" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• TAG work on HTML Doctypes, Versioning, etc. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Dan Connolly
• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Interesting thread on fb: URI scheme and iPhone dispatch on unregistered URIs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons - notes Larry Masinter
• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Larry Masinter
• Agenda for TAG teleconference of 18 February 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Revised draft minutes of call 28 January 2010 ashok malhotra
• Re: Revised draft minutes of call 28 January 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• ACTION-278 security and sharing Jonathan Rees
• Revised draft minutes of call 28 January 2010 Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-278: CSRF defense use case? Tyler Close
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tyler Close
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons - notes Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 16 February 2010

• TAG telcon: Draft minutes of call on 2010-02-11 Henry S. Thompson
• Re: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• ACTION-278: CSRF defense use case? Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Jonathan Rees
• Re: comment on distributed capabilities Jonathan Rees
• Preliminary thoughts on agenda for TAG telcon of 18 Feb 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Paul Cotton

Monday, 15 February 2010

• Re: XML Entity Definitions and scalabilityOfURIAccess-58 Martin J. Dürst

Sunday, 14 February 2010

• Re: XML Entity Definitions and scalabilityOfURIAccess-58 Tim Berners-Lee

Saturday, 13 February 2010

• Re: "confirm subscribe" use case for "secret URI" Jacek Kopecky
• Re: comment on distributed capabilities Mark S. Miller
• Re: comment on distributed capabilities Mark S. Miller

Friday, 12 February 2010

• Re: comment on distributed capabilities ashok malhotra
• Re: comment on distributed capabilities Tyler Close
• Re: comment on distributed capabilities noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• XML Entity Definitions and scalabilityOfURIAccess-58 Dan Connolly
• comment on distributed capabilities Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tyler Close

Thursday, 11 February 2010

• "confirm subscribe" use case for "secret URI" Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Dan Connolly
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 11 Feb 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons John Kemp
• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Larry Masinter
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Robin Berjon
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons John Kemp
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons John Kemp
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons ashok malhotra

Wednesday, 10 February 2010

• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Larry Masinter
• Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 11 Feb 2010 Jonathan Rees
• Agenda for TAG teleconference of 11 Feb 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Jonathan Rees
• RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tyler Close
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: URIs, deep linking, framing, adapting and related concerns Rigo Wenning
• Re: URIs, deep linking, framing, adapting and related concerns Jonathan Rees

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

• RE: URIs, deep linking, framing, adapting and related concerns Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tyler Close
• ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Dan Connolly
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Dan Connolly
• Re: URIs, deep linking, framing, adapting and related concerns Dan Connolly
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements Jonathan Rees
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements Reto Bachmann-Gmür
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tyler Close
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tyler Close
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Amended draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2010 ashok malhotra
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 8 February 2010

• Re: Amended draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Dan Connolly
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons ashok malhotra
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons John Kemp
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Dan Connolly
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons John Kemp
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Larry Masinter

Sunday, 7 February 2010

• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons ashok malhotra
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Jonathan Rees
• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Jonathan Rees
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Mark S. Miller
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Jonathan Rees

Saturday, 6 February 2010

• RE: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Larry Masinter
• Amended draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2010 John Kemp

Friday, 5 February 2010

• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements Dan Connolly
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements Eric J. Bowman
• Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2009 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements Dan Connolly
• Draft minutes of TAG teleconference, 4th February 2009 John Kemp
• Re: HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons Jonathan Rees
• HTML media type vs. # URIs that do not identify document elements Jonathan Rees

Thursday, 4 February 2010

• Comment on Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0 (First Edition) - type handling noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Draft minutes for TAG teleconference of 28 January 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Draft minutes for TAG teleconference of 28 January 2010 Dan Connolly
• found equivocal mozilla discussion of location bar + 307 Jonathan Rees
• ACTION-345: Investigate possible convergence of phonegap and w3C widgets noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

• Re: W3C TAG position on policy mechanisms for Web APIs and Services Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group
• Re: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: A comment on Security and Privacy Implications for Contact APIs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Generic Resources (issue-53) addressed by HTTPbis changeset 745 section.4.p.5? [was: Agenda ...] Dan Connolly
• Re: TAG Resolution on "resource/representation" terminology in HTML 5 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: A comment on Security and Privacy Implications for Contact APIs Robin Berjon
• Re: TAG Resolution on "resource/representation" terminology in HTML 5 Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010 Larry Masinter
• Re: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010 Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

• Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Larry Masinter
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Dan Connolly
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Dan Connolly
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Julian Reschke
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Dan Connolly
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Web-keys (was: Re: Draft minutes of TAG teleconference of 21 January 2010) Tyler Close
• RE: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Larry Masinter

Monday, 1 February 2010

• RE: ACTION-308 (part 2) Updates to 'The Self-Describing Web' Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-308 (part 2) Updates to 'The Self-Describing Web' noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364) Dan Connolly
• Web-keys (was: Re: Draft minutes of TAG teleconference of 21 January 2010) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data Larry Masinter

Last message date: Sunday, 28 February 2010 05:12:53 UTC