- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:35:12 +0000
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
ACTION-172 in the HTML WG is due this Thu Feb 18 and I believe it is awaiting input from the TAG via ACTION-388. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/172 Can the TAG participants working on TAG ACTION-388 give us some idea when you are going to complete this work so that we can make progress on ACTION-172 in the HTML WG? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Larry Masinter Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:28 AM To: Robin Berjon Cc: Jonathan Rees; www-tag@w3.org Subject: RE: ACTION-388 Take a look at LMM's doctype/versioning proposal > Are you suggesting to change the way in which HTML5 > documents handle PUBLID and SYSTEM IDs, as well I > presume as the internal subset, so that they can be > used in conforming text/html serialisations? "documents" don't handle things, "processors" do. There are XML processors and HTML5 processors. I'm proposing to leave HTML5 processors exactly as they are specified, not changing them one teeny bit. I'd like to allow *some* use cases of *some* XML processors that use Public Identifiers and System identifiers to define subsets they're willing to process, and use the pubid and sysid to identify those subsets. Make sense? Larry
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 19:36:02 UTC