- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:26:32 -0600
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, www-tag-request@w3.org
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:40 +0000, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > [...] I don't think we can usually talk > about something being "more secure" or "less secure" without bounding the > range of use cases, the range of threats or information leakage modes that > are a concern, etc. I agree; I was only responding in kind to the test claim that Ashok put out there: Non-public URIs provide a weak level of security that is held to be adequate for some usecases. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 22:26:35 UTC