RE: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010

before sounds good to me.


-----Original Message-----
From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 4:45 PM
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: www-tag
Subject: Re: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 17:27 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
>     4. [12]ISSUE-53: [13]ACTION-231 & [14]ACTION-232
>           + [15]ACTION-231: on Larry - Draft replacement for \"how to
>             use conneg\" stuff in HTTP spec - due 2010-01-12 - Pending
>             review ([16]Email from Larry indicating that "The text was
>             revised and now has been incorporated into the HTTPBIS
>             editor's draft" [17]announcement; [18]diffs])
>           + [19]ACTION-232: on Larry - Follow-up to Hausenblas once
>             there's a draft of HTTPbis which has advice on conneg - due
>             2010-01-29 - Pending review ([20]Email from Larry to
>             Michael Hausenblas & [21]thank you response from Michael
>             H.)

I suggest closing those without discussion... either before the
meeting or during review of agenda.



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 02:27:25 UTC