- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:49:34 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, www-tag@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > ... > I thought that was what the mediatypereg issue was all about. > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/53 > > Its state is closed, which suggests there should be a technical > decision that makes it clear which arguments were discussed and > which weren't, but I can't find it from tracker. > > It sure would be nice if the text of the decision were in > the description or at least clearly cited from there. > > The change log says > 2009-11-19 17:12:22: Status changed to 'closed' [Maciej Stachowiak] > > But I don't see any mail around that time. > > So it's not clear, to me, whether the WG has discussed this or not. > ... "2009-09-24 06:39:35: Moving to PR Blocker per mailing list discussion. [Maciej Stachowiak]" So now it's on a different product (PR Blocker), but should be open. I mentioned this in one of the past telcos, but can't locate the minutes right now. BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 16:50:14 UTC