- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:49:00 -0500
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
I found the draft to be very nicely done and very helpful. Regarding redirect chain UI: I suspect that the biggest problem would be confusion on the part of users who don't really understand redirection in the first place. Now, you could argue that it's just such users who are in the worst trouble given the status quo, since they're most likely to miss the fact that they've been redirected at all. So, perhaps giving them some UI with two URLs will represent appropriate rather than inappropriate confusion. Still, I can't easily imagine anything that would be unintimidating to non-technical users, unless it's to hide the target URL pretty thoroughly (and that would defeat the purpose security-wise, I expect). FWIW: I retain some mixed feelings about using the TAG blog as a publication vehicle for things like this, but as a first step it seems fine. Maybe or maybe not there would be value in evolving this into a short finding or the like. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org 02/23/2010 05:00 PM To: www-tag@w3.org cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/redirects-and-address-bar.txt Written in the style of a blog post, and making use of state-of-the-art theory (such as it is) of http semantics. If this gets review and approval of some kind (especially from TimBL, who has been the vocal campaigner on this question) I'll htmlify and post it and be done with this action. Not sure what else to do. Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 23:46:42 UTC