Re: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 2010

Well, I put them early because I expected they'd be handled with little or 
no discussion, but I think it's worth the time to briefly visit each.  I 
have no objection if this first proposal someone makes is to close either 
or both actions without discussion.  I also note your later note about 
ISSUE-53 then being open with no actions.

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
02/02/2010 07:45 PM
 
        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
        Subject:        Re: Agenda for the TAG Teleconference of 4 Feb 
2010


On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 17:27 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
>     4. [12]ISSUE-53: [13]ACTION-231 & [14]ACTION-232
>           + [15]ACTION-231: on Larry - Draft replacement for \"how to
>             use conneg\" stuff in HTTP spec - due 2010-01-12 - Pending
>             review ([16]Email from Larry indicating that "The text was
>             revised and now has been incorporated into the HTTPBIS
>             editor's draft" [17]announcement; [18]diffs])
>           + [19]ACTION-232: on Larry - Follow-up to Hausenblas once
>             there's a draft of HTTPbis which has advice on conneg - due
>             2010-01-29 - Pending review ([20]Email from Larry to
>             Michael Hausenblas & [21]thank you response from Michael
>             H.)

I suggest closing those without discussion... either before the
meeting or during review of agenda.



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 16:37:34 UTC