- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:20:58 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
The agenda for the TAG teleconference of 11 Feb 2010 (tomorrow) is
available at [1,2], and in text-only form below. Thank you.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/11-agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
[1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: : [3]4 February 2010 Next: 18 February
2010
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/04-agenda
Agenda of 11 February 2010 TAG Teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details - [5]issues list and [6]Issue
Tracker ([7]handling new issues) - [8]www-tag archive - [9]tag
archive
1. Convene
+ Chair: Noah Scribe: Henry Thompson (confirmed)
+ Roll call -- Regrets: Tim Berners-Lee
+ Future regrets: Tim Berners-Lee (Feb 18)
+ Agenda Review - [10]this agenda
+ Next Meeting: 18 February 2010 Chair: Noah Mendelsohn
+ Future scribes: Dan Appelquist -> Dan Connolly -> Jonathan
Rees
2. Approve minutes of prior meeting(s)
+ [11]4 February 2010
3. Administrative items
+ We are still awaiting (as of 10 February) final revisions
to the [12]minutes 28 January 2010 from Larry. Once these
are available, there will be a 2 day pause for objections;
if none are received, the chair will mark the minutes as
approved (see [13]ACTION-385 on Noah)
4. [14]ISSUE-58 & [15]ACTION-163: Sample catalog
+ [16]ACTION-163: on Henry S. Thompson - Coordinate with Ted
to build a sample catalog - Pending Review - Due:
2010-03-01
+ Email from Henry [17]announcing availability of an XML
catalog; see also subsequent emails in that thread.
5. [18]ACTION-345: Widget / Phonegap Convergence
+ [19]ACTION-345: on Noah Mendelsohn - Investigate possible
convergence of phonegap and w3C widgets - Due: 2010-02-17
+ [20]Email from Noah with results of his investigations into
Widget/Phonegap convergence.
6. [21]ACTION-367: Microdata bug report to HTTP WG
+ [22]ACTION-367: on Noah Mendelsohn - Ask the HTML5 chairs
to treat our 8220 bug as input to the poll, specifically as
"An objection to keeping Microdata in", cc to
www-archive@w3.org - Due: 2010-02-10
+ [23]Noah note to HTML WG in fulfillment of TAG ACTION-367,
asking that TAG input on bug 8220 be considered.
[24]Response from HTML WG chair Maciej Stachowiak
confirming that it will be.
+ [25]Brief discussion on 21 January 2010
7. [26]ACTION-278: Draft changes to 2.7 of Metadata in URIs to
cover the "Google Calendar" case
+ [27]ACTION-278: on Jonathan - Draft changes to 2.7 of
Metadata in URIs to cover the "Google Calendar" case - due
2009-12-27 - Pending review
+ [28]Proposal from Jonathan and messages in the thread
following from that.
+ [29]Discussion of ACTION-278 on 21 January 2010 (also:
[30]Tyler Close email regarding minutes of 21 January 2010
TAG call and responses in that thread.)
+ [31]Email from Tyler Close asking for clarification of the
TAG's position on his paper [32]Mashing with permission.
See also responses from [33]Jonathan, [34]Noah, and later
discussion in those threads.
+ Thread starting with email from Jonathan with subject
[35]ACTION-278 Hiding metadata for security reasons
8. [36]ISSUE-41 & [37]ACTION-388: Shorter document on version
indicators
+ [38]ACTION-388: on Jonathan Rees - Take a look at LMM's
doctype/versioning proposal
[39]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan
/0015.html - Due: 2010-02-11. Jonathan [40]asks for
clarification, and [41]Larry responds.
+ See also: [42]ACTION-369: on Larry - Write a shorter
document on version indicators - due 2010-02-04 - CLOSED
review. Larry notes under that action: "On January 2, I
submitted a HTML working group "change proposal" for
reintroducing DOCTYPE versioning with some additional
rationale for why having such a version indicator would be
useful:
[43]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan
/0015.html, and some subsequent discussion of that
document. I think that is a "shorter document" on version
indicators, specifically for the "HTML 5 review" product.
So I claim "a shorter document on version indicators" has
been written. It would be great if some other TAG member(s)
would want to help with this change proposal. [Larry
Masinter]"
9. Pending Review Items:
+ [44]Pending review actions in [45]Tracker
10. Overdue Action Items:
+ [46]Overdue actions in [47]Tracker
11. Any other business
_________________________________________________________
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues
[6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/11-agenda
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/04-tagmem-minutes
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/01/28-minutes
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/385
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/58
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/163
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/163
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2009Dec/0000.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/345
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/345
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0045.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/367
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/367
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Dec/0099.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jan/0001.html
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/01/21-minutes.html#item05
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/278
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/278
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Dec/0121.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/01/21-minutes#item03
[30]
http://www.w3.org/mid/5691356f1001230224n15d30778h456311b81fc83bbc%2540mail.gmail.com
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jan/0087.html
[32] http://waterken.sourceforge.net/web-key/
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jan/0088.html
[34]
http://www.w3.org/mid/OF8C38F5AD.B708DD79-ON852576BB.000190DB-852576BD.0057F615%2540lotus.com
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0051.html
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/388
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/388
[39]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html
[40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0088.html
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Feb/0095.html
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/369
[43]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
Noah Mendelsohn for TAG
$Revision: 1.1 $ of $Date: 2010/02/10 22:18:26 $
[48]Valid XHTML 1.1
[48] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 22:21:40 UTC