- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:38:38 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:54 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > ... > >> Not for restricting the class of documents which can be served. > > > > I disagree. > > ... > > History aside, the Working Group will need to decide whether it *wants* > to make currently conforming HTML4 documents non-conforming text/html. I > don't believe we have discussed this yet, but obviously we need to. I thought that was what the mediatypereg issue was all about. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/53 Its state is closed, which suggests there should be a technical decision that makes it clear which arguments were discussed and which weren't, but I can't find it from tracker. It sure would be nice if the text of the decision were in the description or at least clearly cited from there. The change log says 2009-11-19 17:12:22: Status changed to 'closed' [Maciej Stachowiak] But I don't see any mail around that time. So it's not clear, to me, whether the WG has discussed this or not. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 16:38:40 UTC